19. What Is The Difference Between Capitation And Fee-for-service Payment?

Capitation and fee-for-service (FFS) are unlike modes of payment for healthcare providers. In capitation, doctors are paid a fix amount for each patient they run into, while FFS pays doctors according to what procedures are used to treat a patient. Both systems are in widespread use in the U.S. healthcare system, but FFS has been in turn down over the past decade.

Comparison chart

Capitation versus Fee For Service comparing chart
	Capitation	Fee For Service
	current rating is 3.14/v i 2 3 iv 5 (90 ratings)	current rating is 3.nineteen/five 1 2 3 iv 5 (69 ratings)
Method of payment	A fixed per capita payment fabricated periodically to a medical service provider (every bit a physician) by a managed care grouping (equally an HMO) in return for medical care provided to enrolled individuals	No fixed payments. Providers bill for services delivered and are paid on predetermined rates for each service.
Risk assumed past	Healthcare providers (doctors, hospitals)	Payers (insurance companies)
Focus of intendance/services	health/wellness of assigned population served - continue people healthy	work with assigned patients and care for problems/illness episodes - less focus on wellness & prevention

How Capitation and Fee-for-Service Payments Piece of work

The traditional organization of wellness intendance is that of fee-for-service. A patient visits a md or healthcare facility, is evaluated and treated, and pays for what was washed. Capitation arises as a course of insurance for groups of people, with the intent of spreading exposure (risk) of health care, thus reducing the average individual cost per patient. In the U.South., health intendance paid for without private insurance remains primarily based on FFS, with health insurance plans, including those created under the Affordable Care Human activity, relying mainly on capitation.

Capitation Systems

Under a capitation system, healthcare service providers (physicians) are paid a set up amount for each enrolled person assigned to that md or grouping of physicians, whether or not that person seeks care, per flow of time. For case, a pediatrician may exist paid $thirty for each of the 120 children under his/her intendance, per month, even though the doctor may end up seeing only 35-40 of them (35-40 visits) in an boilerplate month. In other words, the physician receives an average of about $90 per each kid's visit in an average month.

The amount of remuneration is based on the boilerplate expected healthcare utilization of that patient (more remuneration is paid for patients with extensive or complicated medical histories). Other factors considered include age, race, sex, blazon of employment, and geographical location.

The capitation organisation provides financial certainty to both providers (doctors, hospitals) and payers (insurance companies) in the aspects of intendance commitment. Providers assume the take chances of more than patients than expected falling ill and needing intendance. In the case of the pediatric example, if a influenza breaks out among the doctor's patients, he/she may end upwards seeing 55-lx children 3 or four times in that calendar month, a total of over 200 visits, for the same payment, averaging about $18 per visit.

Fee-for-Service Systems

As the proper name implies, FFS payments are made based on invoices for services delivered. In this system, neither the healthcare provider nor the payer accept any certainty equally to medical costs. The gamble of cost overruns caused by more people than expected needing healthcare is assumed by the payer (insurance company) and not the providers.

Continuing the instance of the pediatrician, a FFS plan will pay the doctor for the services required to tend all the children who visit. Some may require only 1-ii tests, while others may need several tests, procedures, and follow-up visits. The projected price per patient tin can thus vary from a few dollars to hundreds or even thousands of dollars.

Application

Over the past decade, capitation has go the preferred form of providing wellness care payments for medical and health plans. Medicaid has been using capitation every bit its base of operations system since the 1970s, though aspects of the plan, such equally mental health treatments and dental care, remained equally FFS. Large insurance companies moved away from FFS systems because the rising costs of lab tests, diagnostic procedures, and medication were severely curtailing profits.

Furnishings on Healthcare Quality

As covered extensively in healthcare industry publications, such as Mod Health Care and Managed Care, FFS programs are seen as beingness "excessive cost" systems, as they encourage doctors to guild a higher number of tests and procedures. The basic incentive (for wellness intendance providers) in the FFS system is to generate more means to get paid, instead of focusing on what the patient truly needs. To doctors in these systems, the rationale is that they are doing everything they can to aid patients and "playing it safety" with tests and procedures. Doctors also bespeak to medical malpractice lawsuits and loftier damage awards as a reason for making sure they have done everything possible to help their patients. This is known as "defensive medicine."^[i][2]

A 2011-2012 report past the Wellness Research and Didactics Trust revealed that Quality of Life Measures (QLM) in mental health patients were higher during and after treatment inside managed wellness (capitation) systems than for those in FFS systems. Although initial treatment costs were roughly equal, there was a pregnant difference in follow-up and further extended treatment costs, as patients nether capitation systems reflected a 22% lower cost of care than those in the FFS systems. Patients in the capitation systems reported an boilerplate QLM 19%-28% higher, and health care practitioners were 26% more satisfied with the intendance they could provide nether the capitation systems' guidelines.

However, some patients encounter FFS systems as useful, for they do get a broader range of health care services. But the trend of these systems is to require pre-approval of tests and procedures, which creates delays in patient care. For patients, these delays are stressful and create an adversarial surround with their health plan or insurer.

Some other criticism of FFS systems is that they encourage later on interventions in wellness intendance, fugitive or downplaying preventive intendance in favor of greater and more profitable efforts (for doctors) when the patient's health breaks down. However, private enterprise insurers are not focused on preventive care, as these health efforts are considered to be largely exterior the realm of straight health care.

Capitation systems are criticized by health care practitioners for focusing more on quantity of health intendance, i.e., moving more than patients through the system, than on true quality of wellness intendance. Every bit capitation pays a set fee per calendar month (or trimester), patients are essentially offered a low-cost choice to visit their doctors as often every bit they experience is necessary. Some capitation systems place limits on patient visits or medical interventions (house or institutional calls), but neither health care practitioners nor patients notice these limits truly helpful.

Capitation systems in health direction organizations and other like health plans ofttimes reduced costs by "scarlet picking" patients. Their focus was on selecting salubrious people and offer a lower fee to these patients to join the plan. Or if a patient suddenly adult a condition requiring major medical costs, the plan or insurer would cease coverage on that person (prior to changes instituted by the Affordable Care Act).

Medicaid'southward Composite System

By combining capitation for bones services and FFS payments for less-required wellness care needs, Medicaid is able to reduce operational costs and absorb the growing number of patients that have risen from the Baby Boomer generation (the largest population growth period in U.South. history). Capitation incentivizes preventive wellness care, including in-home services, while the express FFS treatments allow for cost analysis and adjustments between doctors, service providers, and Medicaid.

References

Wikipedia: Capitation
Wikipedia: Fee-for-service

Share this comparison:

If you read this far, you should follow u.s.:

"Capitation vs Fee For Service." Diffen.com. Diffen LLC, northward.d. Web. 11 May 2022. < >